Federal - H J Res 66

A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental employees.

Introduced

February 7, 2017

Description

A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental employees.

Our Position

Oppose

Original Sponsor 1

Co-Sponsors 7

Latest Actions See More/Less

  • May 17, 2017 — Became Public Law, PL 115-35, 131 Stat. 848. Congressional Record p. D559-D560

  • May 17, 2017 — Signed by the president. Congressional Record p. H5430

  • May 5, 2017 — Enrolled measure signed in the Senate. Congressional Record p. S2799

  • May 4, 2017 — Enrolled measure signed in the House. Congressional Record p. H4183

  • May 3, 2017Durbin, D-Ill., Senate speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.120, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. S2717

  • May 3, 2017Durbin, D-Ill., Senate speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.119, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. S2717

  • May 3, 2017 — Measure cleared for the president. Congressional Record p. S2715

  • May 3, 2017Senate Vote 120 State Retirement Plan Disapproval — Passage
    Passage of the joint resolution that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain state-administered retirement savings plans from select federal regulations governing pension plans if the state programs meet certain standards. Under the rule, the savings program must be established and administered by the state, and the savings plans must be voluntary for the employee for the program to qualify for the exemption. Passed (thus cleared for the president) 50-49. Note: A "yea" was a vote in support of the president's position. Congressional Record p. S2715

  • May 3, 2017 — Considered by the Senate. Congressional Record p. S2692-S2715

  • May 3, 2017Senate Vote 119 State Retirement Plan Disapproval — Motion to Proceed
    McConnell, R-Ky., motion to proceed to the joint resolution that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain state-administered retirement savings plans from select federal regulations governing pension plans if the state programs meet certain standards. Under the rule, the savings program must be established and administered by the state, and the savings plans must be voluntary for the employee for the program to qualify for the exemption. Motion agreed to 51-48. Congressional Record p. S2715

  • Feb. 17, 2017D.M. Payne, D-N.J., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E222

  • Feb. 16, 2017S. King, R-Iowa, House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.96, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. E214

  • Feb. 16, 2017 — Received in the Senate and held at the desk. Congressional Record p. S1302

  • Feb. 15, 2017Roe, R-Tenn., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.91, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. E204

  • Feb. 15, 2017Roe, R-Tenn., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. E204

  • Feb. 15, 2017Huizenga, R-Mich., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.91, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. E204

  • Feb. 15, 2017Huizenga, R-Mich., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. E204

  • Feb. 15, 2017Beatty, D-Ohio, House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.91, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E199

  • Feb. 15, 2017Beatty, D-Ohio, House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E199

  • Feb. 15, 2017Walz, D-Minn., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.91, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E197

  • Feb. 15, 2017Walz, D-Minn., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E197

  • Feb. 15, 2017Visclosky, D-Ind., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.91, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E197

  • Feb. 15, 2017Visclosky, D-Ind., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. E197

  • Feb. 15, 2017Tonko, D-N.Y., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.96, and would have voted nay if present. Congressional Record p. H1222

  • Feb. 15, 2017E.L. Carter, R-Ga., House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.96, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. H1223

  • Feb. 15, 2017House Vote 96 State Retirement Plans Disapproval — Passage
    Passage of the joint resolution that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain state-administered retirement savings plans from select federal regulations governing pension plans if the state programs meet certain standards. Under the rule, the savings program must be established and administered by the state, and the savings plans must be voluntary for the employee for the program to qualify for the exemption. Passed 231-193. Congressional Record p. H1221-H1222

  • Feb. 15, 2017 — Considered by the House. Congressional Record p. H1206-H1217, H1221-H1222

  • Feb. 15, 2017 — Additional cosponsor(s): 3

    Messer, (R-Ind.)Mitchell, (R-Mich.)Wilson, J. (R-S.C.)
  • Feb. 14, 2017McCaul, R-Texas, House speech: Personal explanation for roll call vote no.90, and would have voted yea if present. Congressional Record p. H1160

  • Feb. 14, 2017House Vote 91 State Retirement Plans Disapproval and Local Government Retirement Plans Disapproval — Rule
    Adoption of the rule (H Res 116) that would provide for House floor consideration of a joint resolution (H J Res 66) that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain state-administered retirement savings plans from select federal regulations if state programs meet certain standards. It would also provide for consideration of a joint resolution (H J Res 67) that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain local government-administered retirement savings plans for non-government employees from select federal regulations. Adopted 227-188. Congressional Record p. H1153-H1154

  • Feb. 14, 2017House Vote 90 State Retirement Plans Disapproval and Local Government Retirement Plans Disapproval — Previous Question
    Byrne, R-Ala., motion to order the previous question (thus ending debate and the possibility of amendment) on the rule (H Res 116) that would provide for House floor consideration of a joint resolution (H J Res 66) that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain state-administered retirement savings plans from select federal regulations if state programs meet certain standards. It would also provide for consideration of a joint resolution (H J Res 67) that would nullify and disapprove of a Labor Department rule that exempts certain local government-administered retirement savings plans for non-government employees from select federal regulations. Motion agreed to 227-188. Congressional Record p. H1152-H1153

  • Feb. 13, 2017 — Rules Committee resolution, H Res 116, reported to the House as a rule for H J Res 66.

  • Feb. 13, 2017 — House Rules Committee granted a closed rule providing for consideration of the bill. Congressional Record p. H1113, H1124

  • Feb. 13, 2017 — Full committee proceeding held by the House Rules Committee.

  • Feb. 13, 2017 — Additional cosponsor(s): 2

    Roe, (R-Tenn.)Sessions, (R-Texas)
  • Feb. 7, 2017 — Original cosponsor(s): 2

    Foxx, (R-N.C.)Rooney, F. (R-Fla.)
  • Feb. 7, 2017 — Read twice and referred to: House Education and the Workforce.Congressional Record p. H1083

Legislative Action Center